Suit Seeks to Block Forest Service Use of Fire Retardant to Combat Wildfires

A Montana-based lawsuit against the United States Forest Service could bring sweeping changes to how forest fires are fought in the Sierra Nevada mountains.

Such changes could result in worse wildfire seasons in the future as the lawsuit aims to prohibit the use of aerial fire retardants.

The backstory: The Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics (FSEEE) has filed a lawsuit against the USFS in Montana, the location of the Forest Service Northern Regional headquarters.

  • Chemical retardants that are used by firefighting agencies such as the USFS are tested and approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Missoula Technology and Development Center.

The big picture: Per the lawsuit, the FSEEE is attempting to require the USFS to obtain a Clean Water Act permit to use fire retardant from airplanes.

  • The USFS has agreed to obtain a Clean Water Act permit, but with a two to three year process to obtain such permits, they would not be available until 2024 at the earliest, potentially preventing a major fire-fighting tool in wildfires over at least the next year.

State of play: In response to the lawsuit, the USFS has stated that it cannot fight wildfires while guaranteeing that aerial fire retardant will not drop into any water. According to the USFS, such instances of the aerial retardant dropping into water was less than one percent of all drops from 2012-2019.

Read more on this story at The Sun

AerialFire Staff
AerialFire Staff
AerialFire Magazine strives to provide you with breaking aerial firefighting industry news and information.

Latest Print Edition

Latest Articles

Related articles